Bill Nighy appears in the video subsidy the Robin Hood tax upon banks to lift billions of pounds to quarrel misery as well as meridian change. . Follow us upon chatter during twitter.com
Related to Bill Nighy video backing Robin Hood tax on banks:
backing, banks, Bill, bill nighy, billions, climate change, Hood, Nighy, Robin, robin hood, twitter, video25 Responses to 'Bill Nighy video backing Robin Hood tax on banks'
Leave a Reply
Popular Consolidation
Tax Banking Categories
Consolidation Archive
By Month
- Don’t Pay Your Bank Twice!
- The Bare Facts About Tax—Real Estate, Sales, and Income—in Each Part of the Metro Area
- Human resources departments no longer have to drown in paperwork
- Global Crisis Has Ended, Really?
- Current Federal Estate Tax Laws
- The Return of Zero Percent APR Credit Cards
- Ten Personal Traits That Can Influence Your Rich
- Learn About How to Pay Bills Online
- Reasons Why You Have to Stay Away from Proprietary Credit Cards
- Update Your Tax Refund Delivery Status Information
Resources
Subscribe
- why do you want to join bank
- development in the Investment Banking industry
- fonejacker george pigeon
- fonejacker george monies quotes
- guitar logo
- steve thomas prophecy club
- investment currency scheduled territories
- how to reset the bank cards in electronic monolopy
- why do you want to work for
- can turbotax be loaded on more than one computer
- why work in banking industry
- why do you want to work in a bank
- why would you want to join in the bank?
- TurboTax Premier Federal E-file State 2011
- working in banking industry
Our Network:
Copyright © 2006-2010 Tax and Banking Financial.
Partnering with Bank of America. All Rights Reserved.
Partnering with Bank of America. All Rights Reserved.
the best idea i ever heard !
The European Union is in a total financial mess & you want to pull out another 600,000,000,000 per year to give to charitable organizations? That’s more than the whole country of Greece needs! Are you nuts?!?!
Nice idea but this will never work with privatised banks.Banks need to be nationalised.
@WinstonSmith46 funny that you use the word ‘socialist’ as if it were a bad thing
@Orbi90 according to the WHO reports it’s 40 billion to end world hunger and 400 billion for shelter, water, health etc… 100 billion pounds a year? that’s what? 150 billion dollars +? world hunger could be over tomorow humanity makes me sad hell doesn’t exist ,
How can anyone oppose this?? I think it’s brilliant, and we all need to support it – tell your local MP you want it to go ahead.
@PeteJones100 I am willing to help anyone who will join me in going to take it back.
how about a tax on the so-called “charities” that sit on huge amounts of cash paying executives salaries etc ? Change the law so that they must donate % 90 of there donations and only allowed to keep %10 sitting in banks ,actualy give the money to the people it was purposed to go too ? And my personal favourite tax the church !
how about a tax on the so-called “charities” that sit on huge amounts of cash paying executives salaries etc ? Change the law so that they must donate % 90 of there donations and only allowed to keep %10 sitting in banks ,actualy give the money to the people it was purposed to go too ? And my personal favourite tax the church !
@kered13 Not really,
the idea is to implement this tax on every main bank from around the world which will iteract with the uk banks, and seeing as the worlds banking sector is worth well over a trillion pounds, then 100 billion will be small change, and seeing as it is the banks that got itself into the mess, then surely they should be the ones to get us out,
Great Movie! just seen it, Search Google for “FCDC MOVIES”
“To help save lives in poorest countys”
FUCK other countrys!!!!!!!, when will these bastards start concentrating on this fucking country and get it out the hell hole thats its in right now!!
I see that you have already been answered to but there is one point i still have to make: Dont you think that it would be more sensible to invest money in projects that serve the community instead of keeping the potential in mind boggling financial “games” as they often seem to me, that are totally detached from real progress that should be made (in some sence).
sounds like a pretty logical way for the bankers to PAY BACK WHAT THEY F*CKING OWE US!
@Info4People
I doubt another bank will be bailed out, so there won’t be any government money going to them.
@kered13
No, we don’t. However, this IS a small tax on banks. I’m not sure if the video made it clear or not, but they’re not taxing one bank.
I should remind you that trillions of pounds are traded in foreign markets a day, by banks.
@kered13
That is the idea of percentage:
The clip compares SMALL PERCENTAGE that banks are supposed to pay with LARGE TOTAL SUM of money collected. There is no fallacy in that. You can challenge the figures, but hardly the method.
Of course someone will have to pay this money, but the idea is at least as good as any redistributive system, so maybe you do not like redistributive systems as such (which is OK, but than you would have to fight almost any tax used in modern society).
create your own youtube video from picture and text and share it on youtube………… check out my channel to find out how
Thak You, and please rate my video……
Oh god, such a horrible logical fallacy. They try to argue first that the banks will pay almost nothing, and the very next thing they’re arguing that its going to collect so much money.
The money raised for the government by the tax IS THE SAME money the banks pay. If the tax will collect so much money, then the banks must be losing it. If the banks are paying almost nothing, then the tax must be raising almost nothing.
Seriously, do people think taxes CREATE money or something?
Hold on!
Who is in receivership of taxes: The banks.
Who would pick up the bill for the banks in this case: The people.
Wake up sheeple!
“economy equivalent of burning your bridges before you cross them”
No it’s the economic equivalent of shooting yourself in the face.
There will be less tax revenues from banking than there are now.
Alright, Leave the UK.
Say bye bye to the only profitable sector of your economy. Offshore your banking sector. Nice.
Yes, investment needs to be moved away from short term profits.
However, uncompetitive tax systems and labour legislation has already cost the country its manufacturing sector.
If you unilaterally introduce such a tax and tax financial services away to Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai, Zurich, New York, or Beijing, economy equivalent of burning your bridges before you cross them.
The money from taxes on the banks profits and wages is more money than no money as the business has moved offshore
Not a socialist just a realist. The majority of those 6 billion people live in poverty, and the minority who don’t are bombarded with charity requests to help them.
Sport Relief, Comic Relief, Children in Need and the countless spin offs as well as helping the regular charities and digging deep when earthquakes etc strike.
So as a realist I do think 6 billion would agree the banks should pay more, even if just to free spare cash for us to donate to charity cos the filthy stinking rich wont.
Right! and you think you can speak for 6 billion people, you must be a socialist.