Presented by Douglas E. French during a “Economics for High School Students” seminar. Recorded during a Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama; twenty Nov 2009. Sponsored by Jeremy S. Davis.
Related to Money, Banking and the Current Mess:
20 november, Alabama, Anarchocapitalist, Auburn, auburn alabama, Austrian, Banking, Capitalism, depression, Doug, Douglas, E., economics, Free, freedom, French, High, high school students, Institute, Introduction, Ludwig, market, Mess, Mises, mises institute, money, Peace, Property, recession, s davis, School, Schooler, von25 Responses to 'Money, Banking and the Current Mess'
Leave a Reply
Popular Consolidation
Tax Banking Categories
Consolidation Archive
By Month
- Don’t Pay Your Bank Twice!
- The Bare Facts About Tax—Real Estate, Sales, and Income—in Each Part of the Metro Area
- Human resources departments no longer have to drown in paperwork
- Global Crisis Has Ended, Really?
- Current Federal Estate Tax Laws
- The Return of Zero Percent APR Credit Cards
- Ten Personal Traits That Can Influence Your Rich
- Learn About How to Pay Bills Online
- Reasons Why You Have to Stay Away from Proprietary Credit Cards
- Update Your Tax Refund Delivery Status Information
Resources
Subscribe
- development in the Investment Banking industry
- fonejacker george pigeon
- fonejacker george monies quotes
- guitar logo
- steve thomas prophecy club
- investment currency scheduled territories
- how to reset the bank cards in electronic monolopy
- why do you want to work for
- can turbotax be loaded on more than one computer
- why work in banking industry
- why do you want to join bank
- why do you want to work in a bank
- why would you want to join in the bank?
- TurboTax Premier Federal E-file State 2011
- working in banking industry
Our Network:
Copyright © 2006-2010 Tax and Banking Financial.
Partnering with Bank of America. All Rights Reserved.
Partnering with Bank of America. All Rights Reserved.
FreeAccz. info
i am so happy just got a amazon voucher from them
I am not accusing you of anything… and last time I looked calling someone a rich motherfucker was only coersive as for the motherfucker part.
But you’re right, I totally agree that it might be beneficial if I cut that coercive language… doesn’t help anyways.
My nerve has been struck long before you… and you know exactly by what… you find it in my very first comment… and that never being hit has got nothing to do with you.
Also try a bit harder to distinguish rich and Rothchild.
You speak of elections and I speak of puppet governments… there is no democracy… if that’s what you meant… it’s all neoliberal bs, controlled by “conspiracy”. At least I can laugh about your ignorance.
The reason why I am annoyed with your argumentation is… you actually don’t seem very interested in learning… not that I were a teacher of sorts but surely, you the abc of global finance… that shouldn’t be too hard for someone speaking “economics”, now should it?
Yeah, dream on… or go and try to fool someone else, or keep on fooling yourself.
Conspiracies… what are you, braindead?
If you are too lame to understand what the FED is, how money is created and society fucked in every hole by interest profits then I really can’t help it… either you find someone who explains it to you or you switch on that wobbly stuff up there.
> People, such as me, are sick and tired of this financial bullshit regime.
Government is not going to get any better just because someone else is in charge. Haven’t the last few elections (since you read as someone very young) convinced you of that yet?
> the top of the command chain?
No. Government is the institution with the monopoly on legitimate coercion.
Every other organization, firm or individual must get my agreement first.
That’s what makes government dangerous, that’s why people who love power gravitate to government jobs. Thug cops, for example.
Conspiracies, “who owns the media”, etc, are secondary. Without that power to coerce, I can ignore them.
But then, I am probably more inclined to organize thousands of people laying stones on the streets, just like in La Paz.
People, such as me, are sick and tired of this financial bullshit regime… and therefore expressing our disdain in exactly that kind of language.
I am not buddhist about it. When it comes to it, I will fight, not necessarily but if needed, I will throw those stones and who knows what, even though I have never done so in my life before, even if it were to my personal detriment.
As for weaseling… that is what I wont allow for the financial mafia of this planet any longer.
So you really believe this is about governments & that governments are at the top of the command chain?
Here’s a few thoughts that might make you think otherwise:
1) Who OWNS the media?
2) No conspiracy thingy, just try to assess the probability that a handful of the richest motherfucking assholes in the world actually have nuclear weapons… blackmailing the shit out of western governments since decades… while promoting… “Hey… you, at least, are gonna be rich, sorta, so stop crying.”
If you think you have to apologize for your choice of words, then don’t use those words in the first place.
Trying to weasel out of them just makes you look like more mindless than the cussing in the first place.
> free markets as if those were a good thing independent from environmental circumstances.
Non-sequiter.
It is private property advocates, so called “free market” proponents, who are the most staunch environmentalists you will ever find.
By asserting the sanctity of private property, pollution cannot happen with impunity. There is no “commons” to pollute without punishment.
That’s why pollution is so much worse on “government” land and in “communist” countries.
> I guess you’re a little rich motherfucker
Wrong on all three counts.
However, by your reactions and choices of words, you demonstrate that I have struck a nerve. Even your insults are based upon envy and jealousy.
Try examining your own advocation of coercion, before accusing others of it.
> are NOT sold out or FORCED INTO WAR
Then you might consider looking into Austrian economics and the benefits of voluntary interaction.
The best way to avoid war is to not have a government capable of war.
Promoting government, and eschewing war, is hypocrisy.
Please note that with all my foul language, I have no intentions to attack you or anyone else personally… unless you turn out to be something similar like that CIA head moron by the name of Duane Clarridge as interviewed in “the war on democracy”… but even then, I am more ashamed of your bald ignorance and unbelievable shamelessness than anything else.
Yeah.. and as for some 10 commandments… maybe you try to name them without looking them up.
But then, you might just as well forget that pile of nonsense along the lines of “you shall not worship any other gods”.
I guess you’re a little rich motherfucker and you are wetting your pants because you probably see a lot of agression growing around people like you… for a reason, which you better try a little harder to understand.
It’s the mirror, man. Go take a look.
You are an ignorant little “chose name here”… I am not envious at all… I don’t care for being “rich” …and Mr. Big Balls like you should try a little harder to get that.
What I do care for is that nations and especially the people that make them up are NOT sold out or FORCED INTO WAR and OPPRESSION by wannabe democracy promoters or national security salesmen which in fact are nothing but fascist imperialists… be they black or white.
There is not much intervention if 6 Billion people had about enough and told some 10k to fuck off and return what those never deserved… along with all the wicked military power to control markets instead of fears… but that’s probably too hard for you to get.
I certainly wont stop with that argument for as long as there are people like you who are trying to sell free markets as if those were a good thing independent from environmental circumstances.
So no, no stopping here.
> individuals “owning” more than…
Oh, you’re envious! That explains everything.
There’s a reason that envy is prohibited in one of the 10 Commandments. It is exceptionally destructive to civil interaction.
The rest of your bald assertions are easy to understand, once your envy of others is unveiled. Thank you.
The circular reasoning is in trying to justify intervention by asserting that these interventions are to solve the problems caused by prior interventions.
Just stop.
By he way… there is no circular reasoning in mutual exclusives… so much for logic.
Yeah, got it. About every second ignoramus over here gets wet pants understands democracy as demonocracy.
Onde day you’ll see that whatever liberties you think you deserve constrain those of others. If that’s circular then, well.
The problem isn’t intervention, the problem is egocentrism & power stolen by ignorant warmongers… Bilderbergs, Rothchilds, even Gates.
The problem are individuals “owning” more than what all people of the 50 poorest countries in the world earn in a year.
Circular reasoning.
Target the root of the problem, intervention itself. Then the peripheral problems you say require intervention go away, and thus the justification for intervention is removed.
Democracy as a form of government is just gang rape. A majority deciding what everyone is going to do, like it or not.
Gang rape is still a crime, regardless of how many voted for it.
The free market is democracy without coercion.
I guess there’s either too little logic in that for you or possibly some shallow kind of that’s just the wy things are, deal with it… yeah ask all those people suffering from imperial ignorance how much they like your brainfarts.
Here’s my false premise:
For as long as we are going to have this fraudulent, fucked up private money creation & exponential interest business… free markets are possibly the worst thing there could be.
On the other hand, if we were actually so happy as to live in true democracy instead of imperialism vs. poor motherfuckers… then free markets, hurray.
That’s kind of the fundamental problem with it. There is this slight conflict of interest between free markets and democracy.